New Book Summary: The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt


My latest book summary is for The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion by Jonathan Haidt. This book argues that there's more to morality than harm and fairness—we actually have at least 6 different moral foundations, which is why we’re so divided.

As usual, the key takeaways are below, and you can find the full summary by clicking the link above.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

We have at least 6 moral foundations, like how our tongues have multiple taste-receptors. Those foundations are:

  • Care/Harm
  • Fairness/Cheating
  • Loyalty/Betrayal
  • Authority/Subversion
  • Sanctity/Degradation
  • Liberty/Oppression

Morality varies:

  • People from WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich and Democratic) societies tend to place a lot of weight on the harm principle—the idea that actions are only morally wrong if they cause harm to others.
  • But people in other societies will condemn acts as being “wrong” even if they don’t harm anyone.

The different moral foundations explain we’re divided politically:

  • US Democrats generally care about 2 or 3 of these (Care, Fairness and Liberty to some degree).
  • Socially conservative Republicans value all 6.
  • Libertarians and classically liberal Republicans are more like Democrats, but place more weight on Liberty and less on Care.

Intuition is stronger than reasoning when it comes to morality:

  • Haidt uses the metaphor of an Elephant and its Rider. The Elephant (intuition) is bigger, and governs most of our behaviour.
  • The Rider (reasoning) is like a press secretary. It doesn’t usually make our decisions; it just makes up ad hoc explanations for them.
  • When our intuition tells us something is wrong, but we can’t find a good reason why, we experience moral dumbfoundment.
  • Because the Elephant is in charge, it’s hard to change people’s minds through reasoning alone, especially if debates are hostile. We're more likely to change their minds when surrounded by “friendly Elephants”.

Morality binds and blinds:

  • We are 90% chimp (selfish), 10% bee (groupish). We have evolved to be mostly selfish, but occasionally things can trigger our “hive switch” and make us transcend our sense of self to become part of a bigger whole.
  • Our groupishness has helped us to cooperate in large groups and made humans incredibly successful as a species.
  • Religion can only be understood in terms of how it serves groups. Religions make groups more cohesive and help solve free rider problems.
  • We are divided by religion and politics because our minds were designed for groupish righteousness. Our moral matrices often blind us to the idea that there could be more than one form of moral truth.

As usual, you can find the full detailed summary on my website. If you found this summary useful, consider forwarding to a friend you think might enjoy it.

Thanks for subscribing! Until next time,

To Summarise

ToSummarise.com

I summarise non-fiction books with more detail and critical analysis than you'll find elsewhere. Join my newsletter to get new summaries delivered straight to your inbox!

Read more from ToSummarise.com

I didn’t plan this, but my latest summary for The Case Against Education: Why the Education System Is a Waste of Time and Money by Bryan Caplan comes right as the school year begins for those in the Northern Hemisphere. As usual, the key takeaways are below, and you can find the full summary by clicking the link above. A word of warning: although Caplan makes some great points, I've also found multiple flaws with his arguments, particularly when he tries to calculate the social return and...

In August, I posted 2 book summaries and 1 blog post: Book summaries The WEIRDest People in the World by Joseph Henrich - a very interesting but dense explanation of how WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich and Democratic) cultures are different, and how they got to be that way. Good Strategy, Bad Strategy by Richard Rumelt - covers how to spot the far-too-common examples of "bad strategy" and develop good strategy instead. Blog posts Is it better to be WEIRD? - a long-ish...

You’re probably familiar with bad strategy. It’s full of fluff, lofty visions and desirable outcomes, with no clue on how to achieve these things. In Good Strategy, Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters, Richard Rumelt explains how good strategy is different. As usual, the key takeaways are below, and you can find the full summary by clicking the link above. KEY TAKEAWAYS The word “strategy” has been so misused that many people don’t even know what it means. Bad strategy fails to...